|

Section
1
Introduction
Section 2 Ongoing Projects
Section 3 Studies & Investigations
Section
4
Recommendations
 |
|
|
|
Talbert Watershed
- Reports & Studies
|
 |
Studies Related to the Closure of Ocean Waters Off Huntington Beach
Summer 1999
A Preliminary Review Report
Submitted By:
National Water Research Institute Urban Runoff Peer Review Panel August 25, 2000
|
| Section 4 |
 |
|
General Recommendations and Comments
- A separate study should be implemented to analyze the patterns
found in all data sets collected by this program. Special emphasis should be placed
on the extensive data sets collected in the marshes and coastal ocean through May
3-17, 2000. The analysis should attempt to identify the processes associated with
contaminant transport through the marsh and coastal ocean systems. Once the dominant
processes are identified, robust models of contaminant transport may be developed.
A person experienced with a wide range of coastal processes would be ideal to coordinate
the integrated investigations. Suitable candidates include university professors
in coastal processes, environmental engineers, or people who have related programs
in the area.
- Even though analyses of coastal ocean data may provide
information on transport processes through coastal systems, they alone will not
provide solutions to beach closures. The contaminant data from the watershed has
to be analyzed in conjunction with these other data sets. This analysis will provide
clues as to whether effective watershed management plans can be instituted to prevent
future beach closures.It was not clear whether contaminants
are stored in the sand on the beach, and then reintroduced into the surf zone on
the next tidal cycle. Data from the intensive 24-hour water-sampling program may
provide some insight. In particular, are contaminant levels highest when spring
tides inundate the beach?
- Ten per-cent of all water-quality samples and/or isolates
should be archived whenever possible. These samples would be useful for future fingerprinting
of bacteria and/or chemicals studies that may help determine source identification.
- An assessment should be made of potential contaminant sources
other than those mentioned in the studies. In particular, does the plume from the
offshore discharge pipe ever come onshore? Is the SAR an important contaminant source?
- In many ocean systems, contaminants or pollutants that
are spread by dispersal processes decrease monotonically from the source region,
whether a marsh, a river, or an outfall plume. Hence, it was not clear how high
concentrations of contaminants appeared at beach locations that are not adjacent
to a specific source, such as the TM outlet. It is possible that surface films or
flocculation processes allowed the bacteria to remain concentrated as they traveled,
but the possible importance of this mechanism was not addressed in the conducted
studies.
- The first, massive bacterial concentrations found in 1999
have a distinct ratio of bacterial types and no obvious source; therefore, it is
possible that this was a unique contamination event. The subsequent contamination
events tended to be at lower levels and have a different bacterial ratio. The Panel
recognizes that the subsequent process studies in the marshes and coastal oceans
are attempting to address more normal beach contaminant pathways.
- To determine whether bacterial concentrations are high
enough to warrant beach closures, the waters off of Huntington Beach are sampled
once a day in the early morning. Results from the hourly water-sampling program
will be useful to determine if a daily, early morning sampling program is a viable
method to assess bacterial contamination in the Huntington Beach surf zone. In particular,
data are needed to determine the persistence of the contamination events. If the
standards are exceeded only a few hours during the day, should contamination still
be considered a serious problem?
- The 3-year historical contaminant data set suggests that
there were about 100 events that would, under the present standards, close access
to the ocean at Huntington Beach. Hence, contamination on the beach seems to be
a persistent, not an unusual, occurrence. Some questions that the Panel thought
could be addressed include:
- Is there a historical record of illness associated
with visits to Huntington Beach? If not, is a single high-level bacterial sample
that is taken in the morning enough to warrant a beach closure?
- Is a single water-quality sample representative of
water quality at that site? A sampling program that took several samples at
one time from each site would help determine the statistical variability of
contaminant levels.
- Can a suite of parameters be used as a contaminant
alert rather than relying upon a model of the system.
|
|
|
|