|
Introduction
Table
of Contents
List
of Acronyms
Sections I - V
Section VI
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Section VII
Section VIII
Download
Report
|
|
|
|
Newport Bay Watershed
- Reports & Studies
|
 |
Newport Bay / San Diego Creek Watershed
Project Study Plan
April 1999
|
| |
|
| |
 |
| I. STUDY AREA |
 |
|
The Newport Bay watershed is located along the southern California
coast, approximately 40 miles south of Los Angeles and 75
miles north of San Diego. The watershed encompasses an area
of approximately 98,500 acres (154 square miles), with overland
flows draining toward the Pacific coast into Newport Bay.
Major cities within the watershed include Newport Beach, Irvine,
Tustin, and portions of Orange, Lake Forest, Laguna Hills,
Costa Mesa and Santa Ana (see study map). The watershed has
been rapidly urbanizing over the last two decades, with large
tracts of agricultural land being transformed into commercial
and residential uses. Other land uses include light industrial,
county and state open spaces, and federal properties. Two
large military facilities are also situated within the study
area and are scheduled for closure. These are the El Toro
and Tustin Marine Corps Air Stations.
The principle watercourse of the Newport Bay watershed is
San Diego Creek, which accounts for 78,080 acres (122 square
miles), or about 80% of the Newport Bay watershed area. The
other drainage areas include the Santa Ana-Delhi channel,
Big Canyon and some additional small tributaries. All of the
channels empty into Newport Bay, a coastal estuary of local,
state and Federal significance that is home to the Upper Newport
Bay Ecological Reserve (UNBER). Most of the general erosion
and sediment transport issues identified in the PSP address
the San Diego Creek watershed area. Water quality data collection
and potential ecosystem restoration opportunities address
the entire Newport Bay watershed.
|
|
 |
| II. BACKGROUND |
 |
2.1 The Reconnaissance Study
The Newport Bay Watershed 905(b) Reconnaissance
Study was conducted by the Corps of Engineers to review and
assess past and current activities and trends within the watershed,
and to identify opportunities for addressing river management
investigated hydrology, hydraulics, flooding, river geornorphology,
erosion, sedimentation, land use, geology, soils, water quality,
groundwater, vegetation, endangered species, and cultural
resources. The study identified opportunities for the development
of an integrated watershed management plan (the PLAN) comprising
by local, state, and federal agencies.
The Reconnaissance Study also identified
opportunities for multiple-use projects within the watershed
that could become critical structural elements of the PLAN,
and would provide environmental restoration and water quality
benefits associated with watershed streams and the Bay.
2.2 Other Watershed
Study Efforts
"Serrano Creek Watershed Study",
by the City of Lake Forest provides a general creek restoration
plan to address severe channel erosion.
"San Diego Creek Watershed Enhancement
Plan", EPA wetlands grant to the California Coastal Conservancy,
estimated 1998-1999. The purpose is to develop a comprehensive
watershed enhancement plan, especially for the lower creek,
which addresses sedimentation, water quality problems, habitat
restoration, and recreation. The focus of the plan will be
on developing and recommending specific actions to enhance
the creek and its resources.
"Upper Newport Bay - San Diego Creek
Water Quality Planning Initiative", EPA/SWRCB 205j Grant,
September estimated 1998-1999. The purpose is to support watershed
enhancement actions by creating and maintaining a central
repository of watershed information, conducting watershed
studies, implementing an Evaluation Monitoring Program, and
establishing a stakeholder group to facilitate watershed enhancement
actions. As part of this report, Orange County has prepared
an annotated bibliography of available information and has
a central information repository with over 280 documents at
the University of California - Irvine Library. This is a key
resource in determining what data is already available.
"Upper Newport Bay Water Quality
Enhancement Project", EPA/SWRCB 319 Grant, 1998 - 2000. The
purpose is to reduce or eliminate vegetative and urban trash
debris in the watershed and thereby reduce or eliminate aquatic
life toxicity from these sources.
"Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL's)
for Sediments, Nutrients, and Toxics and Pathogens for the
Upper Newport Bay - San Diego Creek Watershed", EPA 1998.
The purpose is to reduce or eliminate water quality problems
in the creek and Bay and to protect the beneficial uses of
these receiving.
"Natural Community Conservation
Plan & Habitat Conservation Plan, NCCP/HCP, joint programmatic
EIR/EIS, and implementation agreement", Orange County
Environmental Management Agency (now OCPFRD), 1996.
The Corps - Los Angeles District is
currently developing a Scope of Work for a Special Area Management
Plan (SAMP) for aquatic and riparian resources in Orange County.
The work will build on the past accomplishments of the NCCP
and previous planning efforts.
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
| III. FEASIBILITY STUDY
DESCRIPTION |
 |
3.1. Study Objectives
Watershed goals previously identified
by the watershed management committee are also expected to
be partially or wholly addressed through the Corps feasibility
study process. They include:
- Reducing sedimentation and erosion
- Improving water quality
- Assuring flood protection
- Enhancing terrestrial and aquatic
habitat
- Protecting sensitive species
- Improving the quality of life through
education, recreation and aesthetic opportunities.
The general objectives and study products
of the watershed management plan are:
a) A comprehensive update of hydrologic,
hydraulic, and sediment (yield and transport) models for
a range of flow rates for existing conditions and future
conditions within the San Diego Creek watershed.
b) A comprehensive programmatic environmental
document to assist in future watershed management. This
includes identification of the environmental resources (key
species and habitat types) that should be restored, enhanced
or sustained to insure a well-functioning watershed supporting
a wide diversity of plants and animal species.
c) Investigation of site-specific
environmental restoration, sediment control, and erosion
control opportunities within the Newport Bay watershed.
Prioritize alternatives in the event that finding is not
fully available.
d) Evaluation of ground water and
surface water interactions and identification of the relationship
to environmental conditions in Newport Bay watershed and
the Bay. Identify the water quality parameters, and actions
necessary to preserve existing natural resources and enhance
or sustain the diversity and quality of species and habitat
types essential to a healthy, well-functioning watershed.
e) Identification of actions and programs
that can be implemented by Federal, state and local agencies
that can help fund or implement solutions to water quality
problems within the context of continued development of
the watershed.
f) Establishment of a website and
periodical newsletter for information regarding watershed
and bay activities.
3.2 Study Product
Section VI of the PSP describes the
studies that define the existing conditions of the watershed,
and studies necessary to formulate opportunities for improving
watershed management and restoration measures. The organization
of the PSP is consistent with the requirements of the Corps,
listing study activities under their "code of accounts"
for the various study activities. These accounts include:
| |
01-Public Involvement |
02-Institutional
Studies |
03-Social Studies |
| |
04-Cultural Res.
Studies |
05-Environmental
Studies |
06-Fish &
Wildlife Studies |
| |
07-Economic Studies |
8-Surveying and
Mapping |
09a-Hydrologic
Studies |
| |
09b-Hydraulic
Studies |
09c-Sedimentation
Studies |
10-Geotechnical
Investigations |
| |
11-Design &
Cost Estimates |
12-Real Estate
Studies |
13-Study Management |
| |
14-Plan Formulation |
15-Report Preparation |
16-Programs &
Project Mgt. |
| |
17-Quality Control
& Review |
18-Contingencies |
22-Regulatory
Studies |
The watershed study will generate key
technical data, improving the knowledge base necessary for
resource managers to make informed watershed investment decisions
and identifying specific opportunities (restoration projects,
regulatory modifications, educational plans) to improve watershed
health. Development of the following information will be pursued:
1. A comprehensive update of
hydrologic, hydraulic, and sediment (yield and transport)
models for a range of flow rates for existing conditions
and future conditions within the Newport Bay watershed
- Existing conditions will include the recently installed
flood control or drainage facilities. For the future condition,
the modeling will include proposed land use changes, any
additional flood control or sediment control facilities,
and the effects on the delivery of sediment to Newport
Bay.
- Operations and maintenance (O&M) of sediment control
facilities will be investigated through the use of the
models to see if there are opportunities to improve sediment
trapping abilities within the watershed through modification
of O&M activities (i.e. a non-structural approach).
- Potential environmental restoration sites will be investigated
at several sites within the watershed. Multi-use alternatives
will be considered to maximize the benefits for the greatest
number of stakeholders. For example, some of the sites
may also provide sediment control benefits in addition
to restoration. Those potential benefits will also be
investigated using the models.
- Any potential modification of sediment delivery to the
Bay and the effects on the Bay will be documented. It
is assumed that improved sediment trapping would only
result in changes to the frequency of O&M activities
within the Bay for the mid-Bay basin(s) being investigated
as part of the ongoing Newport Bay feasibility study.
The hydrologic, hydraulic, and sediment
yield and transport models (generated under Subaccounts 6.9.A
- Hydrology, 9.B - Hydraulics, and 9.C - Sedimentation) will
benefit the ongoing TMDL process by generating updated baseline
data that will allow for a more accurate assessment of the
sediment and water quality related problems. The models will
also provide a detailed technical basis for the design and
evaluation of multi-use restoration sites for reduction of
sediment and nutrients. The provisions for monitoring and
maintenance under Subaccount 6.9C (Sedimentation) include
a number of the program elements proposed by Orange County
for compliance with the TMDL's.
2. Assessment of surface
water quality as it affects environmental needs and recreational
users. Data regarding
temperature, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, depth, water movement
criteria, sediment loading and other components of water
quality within the watershed and Bay will be collected and
analyzed to determine what constituents are constraining
to environmental resources and recreational activities.
The water quality data collected under Subaccount 6.5 -
Environmental Studies, will be used in development of cost
effective, upper watershed (and bay) treatment measures
that benefit the TMDL process by controlling excessive sediment,
nutrients, pathogens and toxic substances on a regional
basis. The measures will be combined with environmental
restoration projects where feasible.
3. Evaluation of ground
water and surface water interaction and the relationship
to environmental conditions in the Bay. Study
groundwater and surface water interactions, contaminant
issues, feasibility of groundwater dilution and other issues.
Determine methods to improve quality of inflow and in-situ
water. The collected data under Subaccount 6.9.D - Groundwater
Studies can be used to assess the groundwater contribution
of nutrients, toxics, and pathogens to the Bay, and thus
benefits the TMDL process. Groundwater draining to the surface
is also a potential water source for habitat restoration
projects.
4. Evaluation of riparian
habitat. Conduct landscape
scale biologic evaluation to characterize the existing riparian
habitat along the major streams within the watershed, and
determine the locations of particularly high habitat value
and diversity of habitat types. Study riparian corridor
needs. Study relationship with existing channel network.
Determine suitability of existing surface water for habitat,
wildlife and aquatic species. Identify opportunities for
in-channel restoration that is compatible with flood control
objectives. The habitat data generated under Subaccount
6.5 - Environmental Studies will be used in conjunction
with data from previous and ongoing studies to locate and
design site specific multiple use restoration projects.
5. Develop opportunities
for improving sediment detention, flood protection and water
supply for environmental restoration. Study
modification of existing detention facilities, new basins,
and re-operation of existing reservoirs. Perform economic
evaluation and tradeoff analysis of project performance.
The reservoir operations data collected under Subaccount
6.9.A - Hydrology, and 6.9.C - Sedimentation will be used
to determine if additional fine sediment can be trapped
in a cost-effective manner, thus reducing the fine grain
contribution to the Bay. Channel stability analyses under
6.9.C will consider the fine grained basins.
6. Update recreation needs
assessment and user opportunities. Study
recreational constraints and opportunities. Data collected
under Subaccount 6.5 - Environmental and Subaccount 6.7
- Economics will be used to assess the needs, opportunities,
and costs associated with recreation. Early identification
of recreational features for existing and planned water
resource projects will increase the likelihood of inclusion.
7. Improve public awareness
of watershed issues by
developing a website and periodical newsletter for the watershed
and bay, encouraging community education programs, and assisting
in the development of river restoration oriented science
curriculum guidelines for local schools and volunteer groups.
Public awareness is addressed under Subaccount 6.1 - Public
Involvement.
The technical, institutional, and social
data collected and generated in the study is integrated under
Subaccount 6.14 - Plan Formulation. The baseline condition
(existing and future without project) is defined. Project
alternatives are generated, evaluated and refined in an iterative
process. The with-project condition for each alternative is
compared against the baseline, and the benefits, costs and
trade offs are determined. The recommended watershed plan,
which will include both management practices and construction
projects will be selected and justified on clearly defined
criteria.
3.3. "SPIN-OFF" SITE
INVESTIGATIONS
During the development of the PLAN,
specific sites within the watershed will be investigated for
restoration purposes. Eleven "spin-off" sites have
been identified during the reconnaissance study, and are listed
in Section VI, 6.14, Plan Formulation of the PSP. Site locations
are shown on the study map. Some sites may be deleted, or
additional sites added, during the course of the feasibility
study based on more detailed investigations. Time and costs
associated with the spin-off sites are based on investigation
of eleven sites. Study costs will be adjusted accordingly
if the number of sites change.
A reconnaissance-level investigation
of the spin-off sites will be included as part of the baseline
studies, and will provide enough information for decisions
in regards to initiating spin-off feasibility studies. Recommendations
regarding Federal involvement in implementable projects
at these sites will also be determined through this study.
If a specific project(s) can be identified
for implementation under an existing Corps authority, then
a spin-off feasibility study will be undertaken and cost-shared
with the appropriate local sponsor(s). At the F3 Milestone
(see Section V. Milestones) potential spin-off studies will
be identified. By the F4 Milestone, individual PSP's for each
spin-off study will be completed. The watershed feasibility
study will document the initial results of site specific investigations
and the impacts of construction the sites on the watershed
and bay (i.e. additional sediment trapping, water quality
improvements, etc.)
The spin-off feasibility reports will
include the appropriate level of site specific planning and
engineering detail (i.e., engineering appendices, real estate
appendix, NEPA documentation) necessary to implement the proposed
project. This will allow decision-makers to complete the appropriate
technical and policy review, and will provide a report that
can become the basis for congressional authorization of a
specific project. Projects that are part of the watershed
management plan, but fall outside of the Corps mission, can
be implemented by other interested local, state, and federal
agencies.
The watershed management plan and products
generated under this Project Study Plan are not intended to
produce an implementation document for authorization by Congress.
Rather, the study will provide a decision-making framework
within which specific structural projects, nonstructural projects,
and local activities will be identified, and additional, site
specific, spin-off studies may be recommended for implementation.
The watershed management plan will be the overall blueprint
for watershed improvement activities.
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
| IV. LOCAL SPONSORSHIP |
 |
| |
|
A number of public agencies and community groups have indicated
strong support and a willingness to contribute resources (finding
and in-kind services) to the feasibility phase of this watershed
study. During the course of the feasibility study, the County
of Orange will act as the lead agency, facilitating local
communication among the multiple partners, and ensuring that
all partnering requirements with the Corps are met. A Feasibility
Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA) will be executed between the
County and the Corps. Concurrently, the County will enter
into separate, individual agreements with the other local
agencies for cost-recovery and in-kind support for the study.
The Newport Bay Watershed Executive Committee (NBWEC) for
the Newport Bay watershed has been established. The NBWEC,
formerly the sediment executive committee, had initially been
formed in the 1980's, during the implementation of the "208"
sediment control plan for the San Diego Creek watershed and
Newport Bay. This executive committee has expanded their role
within the watershed and has invited new representatives to
participate in watershed related activities. The executive
committee directs the Newport Bay Watershed Management Committee
(NBWMC). The NBWMC will also serve as the Study Management
Committee (SMC) for this feasibility study. The NBWMC is the
focal point for all ongoing watershed efforts and is represented
by Orange County, cities within the watershed, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the Corps, the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), the Coastal Conservancy,
water districts, and several special interest groups. The
NBWMC/SMC will provide a forum for local agencies to have
direct input into the management, direction and progress of
the study. More detail on the role of this committee is discussed
under the Study Management portion of this PSP. The other
public and private agencies indicating a willingness to provide
support for this study are:
City of Newport Beach - Coastal Conservancy
City of Tustin - The Irvine Company
City of Irvine - Irvine Ranch Water District
City of Lake Forest - Orange County Water District
City of Costa Mesa - Regional Water Quality Control Board
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
| V. STUDY MILESTONES |
 |
The Corps, Los Angeles District, is responsible for following
the milestone schedule listed below. The start date for this
schedule and, therefore, all subsequent dates are contingent
upon execution of the FCSA and receipt of local sponsor funds.
The overall study duration is currently estimated to be twenty-nine
months.
|
Date
|
Milestone
|
Action |
|
07/99
|
--
|
Execute Feasibility
Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA) |
|
08/99
|
F1
|
Receive Funds/Begin
Feasibility Study |
|
10/99
|
F2
|
Public Workshop #1.
Establish protocol for public involvement and agency coordination;
present draft public involvement plan; other public workshops
to be scheduled if needed. |
|
11/00
|
F3
|
Formulation Analysis
Conference. Establish current and likely future baseline
conditions, identify, describe and discuss preliminary
watershed restoration alternatives and spin-off feasibility
studies; establish decision framework for watershed analyzes
and plan selection; methodology for incremental cost-effectiveness
analysis. |
|
03/01
|
F4
|
Feasibility Conference
No.2. Project Study Plans for the watershed spin-off site
specific projects will be complete and the spin-off feasibility
studies will be initiated; Draft Feasibility Report and
EIS/EIR completed. |
|
06/01
|
F5
|
Submit Public Draft
Feasibility Report and EIS/EIR |
|
07/01
|
F5A
|
Feasibility Review
Conference (FRC) with HQUSACE |
|
06/01
|
F6
|
Field Level Coordination
(Public Review) |
|
07/01
|
F7
|
Final Public Hearing |
|
10/01
|
F8
|
Submit Final Feasibility
Report and EIS/EIR |
|
11/01
|
F9
|
Div Eng Cert/Dist Eng
Notice |
|
|
|
|